September, 2008


Free eNewsletter Subscription

LiveFrom - Cable-Tec EXPO '08

CED Home
E-newsletters
CED Broadband Direct Archive
IP Capsule Archive
Product Showcase Archive
xOD Capsule Archive
Subscribe to CED

Tools
Emerging Tech '08 Show Daily
Broadband White Papers
Buyers Guide
Events Calendar
Webcasts
CED Wallcharts
Live From the Show Video Archive
View From the Top Video Archive

Topics
Broadband Business
Cable Telephony
Digital Future
Fiber Optics
HFC Architecture
Internet Services

Magazine
Archives
Current Issue
Digital Edition Sample
Show Dailies
Subscribe to Print

Editorial
Contact the Editor
Editorial Staff
Feedback
News Release Policy
Reprints
Submit Event for Online Calendar
Submit News Release
Submit Your White Paper

Advertising
2008 Editorial Calendar
Ad Specifications
List Rental
Media Kit
BPA Statement (June 2007)
Sales Contacts

Our Partner Sites
ECN
Product Design & Development
Wireless Week

Quick Links
Media Kit



CED Calendar & Buyers' Guide




NAB, ACA quarrel over dual must-carry
By Brian Santo
CedMagazine.com - March 07, 2008

The National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) attacked the American Cable Association (ACA) for asking for an exemption from dual must-carry rules associated with the digital television transition, compelling the ACA to fire back, restating its case and throwing in an accusation of extortion to boot.

The FCC currently has a proviso that allows small operators to file for such an exemption, but the ACA argues the process is unduly burdensome for the smallest cable companies. The ACA filed a request with the FCC seeking blanket exemption for small independent cable providers. 

The NAB has been intransigent when it comes to dual must-carry, even for small companies the NAB must know cannot afford to comply. Subsequent to the ACA’s filing of its request, NAB executive vice president Dennis Wharton published a statement that says, “Cable operators can't have it both ways. They cannot make grandiose claims of spending billions on digital upgrades, while asserting that they still lack sufficient channel capacity to carry local broadcast channels.”

ACA president and CEO Matt Polka shot back: “Our members who would be covered by ACA's requested exemption aren't the ones who made the ‘grandiose claims of spending billions on digital upgrades.’ They wish they had it for their customers' sake. But they don't because NAB ultimately wants them to spend what little they do have on dual-carriage and other mandates.

“It is the broadcasters who should not have it both ways – simultaneously lobbying to defend their right to extort hundreds of millions of dollars in retransmission consent fees from independent cable operators and then demanding that these same small businesses pay for costly equipment to carry must-carry signals in both analog and digital formats,” Polka continued.

“For many small cable operators, there is not enough capacity or money to comply with a dual-carriage obligation and at the same time have the necessary resources to roll out advanced services, such as broadband, that are critical to the rural communities they serve. The exemption ACA has requested is not only reasonable, but also practical and appropriate, and we urge the FCC to approve exemptions for small systems with limited resources."

More Broadband Direct:

• VTran Media sues Midcontinent Communications over VOD patents 

• NAB, ACA quarrel over dual must-carry 

• Hong Kong broadcaster chooses Thomson for digital terrestrial deployment 

• Nortel makes a play for IPTV 

• Broadband Briefs for 3/7/08


Related Content
ACA cautions congress on impact of digital transition on retransmission deals
American Cable Association asks FCC for relief on dual carriage mandate
ACA asks FCC for quiet period during digital transition

 


Search CED
 

Sponsors





Upcoming Events

 IBC 2008 Conference - Click Here

2008 FTTH Conference & Expo 

TelcoTV08 - Register Now



Advantage Business Media
Use of this web site is subject to its Terms and Conditions of Use.
Copyright 2008 Advantage Business Media. View our Privacy Policy.