CED Magazine - November 2008


Free eNewsletter Subscription

CED Home
E-newsletters
CED Broadband Direct Archive
IP Capsule Archive
Product Showcase Archive
xOD Capsule Archive
Subscribe to CED

Tools
Emerging Tech '08 Show Daily
Broadband White Papers
Buyers Guide
Events Calendar
Webcasts
Digital Library
CED Wallcharts
Live From the Show Video Archive
View From the Top Video Archive

Topics
Broadband Business
Cable Telephony
Digital Future
Fiber Optics
HFC Architecture
Internet Services

Magazine
Current Issue
WEB EXTRA
New Products
Archives
Digital Edition Sample
Show Dailies
Subscribe to Print

Editorial
Contact the Editor
Editorial Staff
Feedback
News Release Policy
Reprints
Submit Event for Online Calendar
Submit News Release
Submit Your White Paper

Advertising
2008 Editorial Calendar
Ad Specifications
List Rental
Media Kit
Sales Contacts
BPA Statement June 2008

Our Partner Sites
ECN
Product Design & Development
Wireless Week

Quick Links
Media Kit


2008 CED Calendar [digital version]




FCC weighing Comcast’s view in net neutrality spat
By Brian Santo
CedMagazine.com - February 26, 2008

Service providers should not be able to block Internet traffic, most speakers agreed at a public forum convened by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in Massachusetts. But FCC Chairman Kevin Martin said the crux of the matter was whether anyone has been illegitimately blocking traffic. 

The event prompting the meeting was the discovery last year that Comcast occasionally cuts off some peer-to-peer (P2P) traffic in the course of network management.

According to Martin: “The question is: What are reasonable network practices? Networks may have legitimate network management practices. Obviously network operators can take reasonable steps to manage traffic, but they cannot arbitrarily block access.” The comment was from the text of Martin’s opening statement.

“Consumers have alleged that operators are blocking or degrading consumers' access to the Internet by distinguishing between certain peer to peer applications,” Martin continued. “Consumers have alleged that these operator practices have not been transparent.”

With that statement, Martin may have signaled a willingness to entertain Comcast’s rationale that its actions were in keeping with legitimate network management practices, but by raising the issue of a lack of transparency, also hinted that even if Comcast were justified in its actions, the company might not be entirely off the hook.

At Monday's hearing, Comcast EVP David L. Cohen reiterated that Comcast only interrupts file-sharing sessions when P2P traffic is so heavy it would compromise other services.

"We have chosen the least-intrusive method to help the vast majority of our customers avoid service degradation," Cohen said.

Timothy Wu, a Columbia University law professor, explained that the issue of disclosure of network practices is crucial for Internet firms that must rely on venture capital funding for survival. If investors learn that major broadband providers will delay or block a particular firm's Internet transmissions, they'll take their money elsewhere, he said.

More Broadband Direct:

• FCC weighing Comcast’s view in net neutrality spat 

• Mediacom’s Q4 losses balloon 

• McAfee’s Internet security tools deployed by Cox 

• Dish Network posts Q4 profit 

• Liberty Media gets FCC approval for control of DirecTV 

• Qwest signals desire for a stronger mobile product 

• Tellabs’ board names Pullen as new CEO 

• IAB, PwC: Internet ad revenues for 2007 to reach $21.2B 

• Broadband Briefs for 2/26/08 


Related Content
Broadband Briefs for 4/17/08
Congress revisits net neutrality bills
Shaky telecom legislation caught up in net neutrality war

 


Search CED
 

Sponsors





Upcoming Events

 
 New Live Webcast - Register Here



Advantage Business Media
Use of this web site is subject to its Terms and Conditions of Use.
Copyright 2008 Advantage Business Media. View our Privacy Policy.